We konden deze vermelding niet vinden. Er worden benaderende resultaten weergegeven. Controleer je spelling of stel voor deze term aan het woordenboek toe te voegen.
或偏离
States parties may in no circumstances invoke article 4 of the Covenant as justification for acting in violation of humanitarian law or peremptory norms of international law, for instance by taking hostages, by imposing collective punishments, through arbitrary deprivations of liberty or by deviating from fundamental principles of fair trial, including the presumption of innocence.
Further, article 4 (1) requires that no measure derogating from the provisions of ICCPR can be inconsistent with the State party's other obligations under international law, particularly the rules of international humanitarian law, and that States parties may in no circumstances invoke article 4 of ICCPR as justification for acting in violation of humanitarian law or peremptory norms of international law, for instance by taking hostages, by imposing collective punishments, through arbitrary deprivations of liberty or by deviating from fundamental principles of fair trial, including the presumption of innocence.
Reaffirming the principle of compatibility of the two branches of international law, the Committee also reiterated that "States parties may in no circumstances invoke article 4 of the Covenant as justification for acting in violation of humanitarian law or peremptory norms of international law, for instance by taking hostages, by imposing collective punishments, through arbitrary deprivations of liberty or by deviating from fundamental principles of fair trial, including the presumption of innocence"
In this connection, the Human Rights Committee extends in its General Comment No. 29 the list of non-derogable provisions as provided for by article 4 (2), emphasizing that States parties to the Covenant "may in no circumstances invoke article 4 of the Covenant as a justification for acting in violation of humanitarian law or peremptory norms of international law, for instance by taking hostages, by imposing collective punishments, through arbitrary deprivation of liberty or by deviating from fundamental principles of fair trial, including the presumption of innocence."
Thus, in the opinion of the Human Rights Committee, States parties to the Covenant may in no circumstances invoke article 4 of the Covenant as justification for acting in violation of humanitarian law or peremptory norms of international law, for instance by taking hostages, by imposing collective punishments, through arbitrary deprivations of liberty or by deviating from fundamental principles that guarantee a fair trial, including the presumption of innocence.
Er worden alleen voorbeelden gegeven om u te helpen het woord of de woordcombinatie waarop u hebt gezocht, te vertalen. Deze worden niet door ons geselecteerd of gevalideerd en kunnen ongepaste taal bevatten. Wij vragen u melding te maken van voorbeelden die dienen te worden aangepast of verwijderd. Vertalingen met grof of informeel taalgebruik worden meestal rood of oranje gemarkeerd.